If you have any other questions or if you have comments on any answer, simply click here and ask. The Inventor will respond with an answer within 48 hours.
ANSWERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE
SECRET OF CONSTRUCTION COST COMPARISON
A MESSAGE FROM THE INVENTOR ABOUT
MARKETABILITY OF OMNICRETE:
Please
understand the answer to the most frequently asked question asked to me,
management and sales associates. Here is that question; how much does Omnicrete cost as compared to other construction
processes?
My
reply is always the same and here it is:
“If any other construction process was increased to the standards of quality to
the Omnicrete technology in order be close or equal to the energy efficiency,
wind resistance, fire resistance, mold and mildew resistance, termite
resistance, maintenance resistance, sustainable, green and so on that system
would cost 2 to 3 times more than the Omnicrete system. That is of course
assuming these other systems are capable of coming close to Omnicrete in
benefits.
However answering the question directly on point, I
would make the following observation; the construction cost of Omnicrete is
very comparable to conventional block and wood costs and significantly less
than Styrofoam, SIP and panelized systems. Keep in mind also that 78.5% energy
savings over the life of the home will significantly reduce the effective cost
of the construction of the Omnicrete home. Therefore examining the construction
cost only is a moot and pointless exercise.”
INGENIOUS INVENTION – MOLD / ENERGY EFFICIENCY ISSUES
SOLVED
THE SECRET
BEHIND THE INVENTION
The extreme energy savings of the Omnicrete system resides
in the tightness of the wall and roof. The secret of the thermal benefit of the
Omnicrete system is that our walls DO
NOT freely breathe. 99.9% of all builders and engineers will preach
on breathe ability of the wall; that the wall MUST breathe to prevent mold and
moisture problems. That is 180 degrees off base. In fact, free breathe ability is
what CAUSES moisture problems and
mold.
When air
travels through the wall of most building systems it brings with it moisture
(AAC claims high “breathe ability”); in fact, as most people understand water (H2Ois
part of air (Hydrogen and Oxygen are major components of air). In
The same
principal is true with air freely coming through the wall from the outside of a
building. When the hot moist air travels through the wall the closer it gets to
the cool air inside the home the more moisture is dropped (condensation). After
months of moisture buildup against the backside of the drywall the process of
mold begins. However Omnicrete blocks the mold and keeps the hot air and
moisture in air away from the “cool” part of the wall and prevents any mold or
moisture issues. Actually the AAC outer wall “breaths” and allows any potential
moisture to escape back out to the outside of the building. As water seeks its
own level so does excessively moist condensed air seeks to balance to the
outside dryer air; even though the outside air contains high amounts of water
as vapor it is less moist then the actual water inside the AAC outer wall.
At this point of the explanation, almost everyone says that if
fresh air is not introduced into the building moisture will build up due to
people adding moisture from their breath and a number of other factors. They
would be absolutely correct in that assumption. So what Omnicrete does to keep
the air fresh and dry in its
building is to properly control and treat the air being exchanged through a
ventilated air conditioning system. From 10% to 30% of air circulating through
the air conditioning system gets “exchanged” to the outside. The incoming air runs
through an air exchange filtration unit which filters pollen and other
particulates from the fresh oxygenated air and then the air goes directly into the
“mixture” box of the air conditioning system for the removal of moisture. In
summary, does the Omnicrete building breathe? Yes but not freely, and not with
untreated air but with fresh, clean and re-oxygenated dry through an air
“EXCHANGE” unit connected to the air conditioning system. This was discovered
during a $2,000,000 test in
Len Terry
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is AAC?
Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) is an amazing discovery that came from
These materials, found in nearly unlimited quantities all over the world, are processed to obtain a building material with a large number of air pores (aerated concrete). It is precisely these pores plus the solid structure of calcium silicate hydrates, which gives AAC its exceptional product properties: excellent thermal insulation against high and low temperatures, universal applications and efficient construction properties, that save labor, time and energy.
Environmentally friendly and energy-conserving, AAC meets all the requirements of our modern age. Absolutely no pollutants or hazardous waste are generated in the process and there is no wastage of precious raw materials. The low temperature steam curing process also saves energy and the thermal energy is recovered during the process for maximum efficiency. Production trimmings are recycled back into the next batch creating an ideal environmentally safe production process.
Today, scores of companies manufacture AAC type material worldwide, while enjoying the seemingly endless supply and abundant availability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Green building is the practice of increasing the efficiency with which buildings use resources — energy, water, and materials — while reducing building impacts on human health and the environment, through better siting, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and removal — the complete building life cycle.
A similar concept is natural building, which is usually on a smaller scale and tends to focus on the use of natural materials that are available locally. Other commonly used terms include sustainable design and green architecture.
The related concepts of sustainable development and sustainability are integral to green building. Effective green building can lead to 1) reduced operating costs by increasing productivity and using less energy and water, 2) improved public and occupant health due to improved indoor air quality, and 3) reduced environmental impacts by, for example, lessening storm water runoff and the heat island effect. Practitioners of green building often seek to achieve not only ecological but aesthetic harmony between a structure and its surrounding natural and built environment, although the appearance and style of sustainable buildings is not necessarily distinguishable from their less sustainable counterparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are the Economic Benefits of Building Green?
A green building may cost more up front, but saves through lower operating costs over the life of the building especially when building with Omnicrete and enjoying a 75% savings of your heating and cooling costs. The green building approach applies a project life cycle cost analysis for determining the appropriate up-front expenditure. This analytical method calculates costs over the useful life of the asset.
These and other cost savings can only be fully realized when they are incorporated at the project's conceptual design phase with the assistance of an integrated team of professionals. The integrated systems approach ensures that the building is designed as one system rather than a collection of stand-alone systems.
Some benefits, such as improving occupant health, comfort, productivity, reducing pollution and landfill waste are not easily quantified. Consequently, they are not adequately considered in cost analysis. For this reason, consider setting aside a small portion of the building budget to cover differential costs associated with less tangible green building benefits or to cover the cost of researching and analyzing green building options.
Even with a tight budget, many green building measures can be incorporated with minimal or zero increased up-front costs and they can yield enormous savings especially when building with Omnicrete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is LEED Design?
The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System, developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), provides a suite of standards for environmentally sustainable construction. Since its inception in 1998, LEED has grown to encompass over 14,000 projects in 50 US States and 30 countries covering 1.062 billion square feet (99 km²) of development area. The hallmark of LEED is that it is an open and transparent process where the technical criteria proposed by the LEED committees are publicly reviewed for approval by the more than 10,000 membership organizations that currently constitute the USGBC.
Individuals recognized for their knowledge of the LEED rating system are permitted to use the LEED Accredited Professional (AP) acronym after their name, indicating they have passed the accreditation exam given by the USGBC.
LEED began its development in 1994 spearheaded by Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) senior scientist Robert K. Watson who, as founding chairman of the LEED Steering Committee until 2006, led a broad-based consensus process which included non-profit organizations, government agencies, architects, engineers, developers, builders, product manufacturers and other industry leaders. Early LEED committee members also included USGBC co-founder Mike Italiano, architects Bill Reed and Sandy Mendler, builder Gerard Heiber and engineer Richard Bourne. As interest in LEED grew, in 1996, engineers Tom Paladino and Lynn Barker co-chaired the newly formed LEED technical committee.
From 1994 to 2006, LEED grew from one standard for new construction to a comprehensive system of six interrelated standards covering all aspects of the development and construction process. LEED also has grown from six volunteers on one committee to over 200 volunteers on nearly 20 committees and nearly 150 professional staff.
The move towards LEED certification of buildings and green building practices has been driven greatly by the tremendous benefits which are a direct result of implementing a green approach. LEED certified buildings use key resources more efficiently when compared to conventional buildings which are simply built to code. LEED certified buildings are healthier work and living environments, which contributes to higher productivity and improved employee health and comfort. The USGBC has also compiled a long list of benefits of implementing a LEED strategy which ranges from improving air and water quality to reducing solid waste. The fundamental reduction in environmental impacts in addition to all of the economic and occupant benefits goes a long way for making a case for green building. It is also important to note that these benefits are reaped by anyone who comes into contact with the project which includes owners, occupants and society as a whole.
These benefits do not come without a cost however. Green buildings cost more both to design and to construct when compared to conventional buildings. The cost of designing a LEED certified building is higher for several reasons. One reason is that sustainable construction principles may not be well understood by the design professionals undertaking the project. This could require time to be spent on research. Some of the finer points of LEED certification (especially those which demand a higher-than-orthodox standard of service from the construction team) could possibly lead to misunderstandings between the design team, construction team, and client, which could result in delays. Also, there may be a lack of abundant availability of manufactured building components which meet LEED standards. Pursuing LEED certification for a project is an added cost in itself as well. This added cost comes in the form of USGBC correspondence, LEED design-aide consultants, and the hiring of the required Commissioning Authority (CxA) (all of which would not necessarily be included in an environmentally responsible project unless it were also seeking LEED certification).
Often times when LEED certification is pursued, the initial construction cost of the project will be higher than the current industry standard. However, these high initial costs can be effectively mitigated by the savings incurred over time due to the lower-than-industry-standard operational costs which are typical of a LEED certified building. Additionally, economic payback may come in the form of employee productivity gains incurred as a result of working in a healthier environment. Studies have suggested that an initial up front investment of 2% extra will yield over ten times the initial investment over the life cycle of the building.
Although the deployment of the LEED Standard has raised awareness of Green Building practices, its scoring system is skewed toward the ongoing use of fossil fuels. More than half of the available points in the Standard support efficient use of fossil fuels, while only a handful are awarded for the use of sustainable energy sources. Further the USGBC has stated support for the 2030 Challenge, an effort that has set a goal of efficient fossil fuel use by 2030.
Different LEED versions have varied scoring systems based on a set of required "prerequisites" and a variety of "credits" in the six major categories listed above. In LEED v2.2 for new construction and major renovations for commercial buildings there are 69 possible points and buildings can qualify for four levels of certification:
LEED certification is obtained after submitting an application documenting compliance with the requirements of the rating system as well as paying registration and certification fees. Certification is granted solely by the Green Building Council responsible for issuing the LEED system used on the project.
Recently the application process for new construction certification has been streamlined electronically, via a set of active PDFs that automates the process of filing the documentation.
Reference Cited: Most information above was received directly or indirectly for the USGBC.com web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Carbon Footprint?
It is expected that LEED-NC 3.0 will include a requirement for a carbon footprint (carbon building print) and a significant reduction of GHG (green-house gases) beyond a baseline level. The reduction in carbon dioxide must be measured based on the direct and indirect carbon dioxide and equivalent reductions. These include emissions related to the consumption of grid delivered electricity, on-site combustion of fossil fuels, and fugitive refrigerant emissions.
The efforts to quantify emission and reductions in emissions will be in an effort to monetize the climate change externally in the same way that a Kyoto Clean Development Project (carbon project) does. There has been one green building project in the world to monetize the reductions that acts as the main precedent for this type of project. This was the ITC Hotel Sonar Bangla Sheraton & Towers Kolkata, India.
The materials used in the Omnicrete process generates the smallest Carbon Footprint as compared to wood, block and Styrofoam ICF wall systems. For example the energy consumed and the consequence of expending fossil fuels to cut down trees and cut the wood in a manufacturing facility and then deliver the wood to a job site is far more extensive and leaves a greater carbon foot print then does the process of constructing within the Omnicete process. The ICF system uses Polystyrene as a building product thats intention is to save energy. Since Polystyrene is a petroleum based product the concept of using it is at best an oxymoron. How ungreen can a system be. ICF's brag about being "Green" and use a petroleum based product in it construction process. Similar to this concept is block and wood construction that use wood and plastics through out its constuction process. How rediculious can the world become when HGTV and the USGBC promote Green building showing an ICF, Wood or Block construction.
Let's get real; building with Omnicrete yields a system that maximizes green points and uses ALL Green materials and offers Maximum Sustainable LEED Points and saves 75% energy on heating and cooling costs (what's greener than that)!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eco-friendly, or ecological, construction is building a structure that is beneficial or non-harmful to the environment, and resource efficient. Otherwise known as green building, this type of construction is efficient in its use of local and renewable materials, and in the energy required to build it, and the energy generated while being within it.
Eco-friendly construction has developed in response to the knowledge that buildings have an often negative impact upon our environment and our natural resources. This includes transporting materials hundreds or thousands of miles, which has a negative impact in the energy required to transport them, and also in emissions of hazardous chemicals from a poorly designed building that creates, and traps them.
Since most materials used in the Omnicrete process are local to the job sites (ie; sand, stone, AAC, etc.) and inorganic the earth is not harmed by construction activities and occupying the building. Other types of construction such as wood, drywall, polystyrene, metal are very harmful to our environment in many direct and indirect ways.
Omnicrete is by far the MOST Eco Friendly system ever to enter the world construction industry. How block, wood, SIP's and ICF's are non Eco Friendly will be forthcoming within the next several weeks as an expansion of this article.
Time does not permit expansion on this most important topic at this time. Many areas of this web site alludes to the destructive nature of conventional and non conventional construction methods that are main stream and acceptable methods of construction used today. These items are issues that most builders do not want the consumer to be aware of; Stay tuned...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First understand that if you can eat a substance "Organic" is good. If you can't eat a substance "Organic" is bad. Organic food for example is better than inorganic foot or food that is not Organic. When it comes to building materials Organic materials are materials when interacting with moisture and oxygen will deteriorate over time. For example wood and wood products like paper are organic and when interacting with moisture and the oxygen that is in water and air rot and breaks down. Many organics also burn with the presents of heat and oxygen. Oxygen destroys everything organic either slowly called rotting and rusting or rapidly called fire. Our lives are sustained by oxygen but all organic matter on earth is destroyed by oxygen. That is why inorganic materials must be used on construction of buildings. Omnicrete uses inorganic materials inside and outside it's buildings. Where organic material are used such as wood trim it is used where the environment is completely dry. Omnicrete offers an upgrade for trim that is a composite material not made from wood but the cost is rather high but it is available to make the Omnicrete building organic free. Even kitchen cabinets are available from inorganic materials.
Now lets get a bit more scientific. Organic compounds differ from most inorganic compounds by having relatively low melting and boiling points. Many of the simple ones are liquids or gases, indicating that the attractive forces between the small molecules are weak. As discussed in CBD 76, organic molecules must be large to possess the properties needed for use in a building material. Even most of the large molecules, polymers, will melt or decompose at temperatures of 300 to 400°C. Because carbon can be oxidized to carbon dioxide and the hydrogen usually present to water, organic compounds are not often stable at elevated temperatures in the presence of air, as are inorganic materials. Although they may be simple molecularly, the latter generally have strong attractive forces that result in high melting points and structural strength. On the other hand, organic polymers, because of their low melting points, can readily be formed into desired shapes and usually are less brittle.
The actual weathering process can be extremely complex, involving a number of weathering factors acting together and resulting in other process interactions within or on the material. This Digest has attempted to characterize various organic building materials and to deal with their reaction to weather factors individually as a simplification of the total process. An appreciation of these individual factors and processes is necessary for an understanding of material behavior and as a rational basis for prediction of performance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
